Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

10´ë ÇϾǰúµÎÈí¼ö ȯÀÚÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû Æò°¡ ¹× ¾Ç¾È¸é °ñ°ÝÇüÅ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Clinical Assessment and Cephalometric Characteristics of Patients with Condylar Resorption in Teenagers

´ëÇѱ¸°­³»°úÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 35±Ç 1È£ p.61 ~ 73
Àü¿ëÇö, ÇãÀ±°æ, Á¤À籤, äÁ¾¹®, ÃÖÀç°©,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Àü¿ëÇö ( Chun Yong-Hyun ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÇãÀ±°æ ( Hur Yun-Kyung ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤À籤 ( Jung Jae-Kwang ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç
äÁ¾¹® ( Chae Jong-Moon ) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
ÃÖÀç°© ( Choi Jae-Kap ) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

2006³â ÇÑ ÇØ µ¿¾È °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ±¸°­³»°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ÇüÅÂÀû º¯ÀÌ°¡ °üÂûµÈ 10´ë °úµÎÈí¼ö ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç¿Í ¾Ç¾È¸é °ñ°ÝÇüŸ¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ÀÓ»óÀû Æò°¡
1) 10´ë °úµÎÈí¼ö ȯÀÚ´Â 59¸íÀ¸·Î ¿©ÀÚ´Â 47¸í, ³²ÀÚ´Â 12¸íÀ¸·Î ¿©ÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¿ùµîÈ÷ ¸¹ÀÌ À¯¹ßµÇ¾ú´Ù. ȯÀÚÀÇ ¿¬·ÉºÐÆ÷´Â 12¼¼°¡ 2¸í, 14¼¼°¡ 9¸í, 15¼¼°¡ 4¸í, 16¼¼°¡ 8¸í, 17¼¼°¡ 12¸í, 18¼¼°¡ 12¸í, ±×¸®°í 19¼¼°¡ 12¸íÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.
2) °úµÎÀÇ ÆíÆòÈ­³ª ħ½Ä, °úµÎÇüÅÂÀÇ º¯ÇüÀÌ ÃÊ·¡µÈ Grade ¥±¸¦ ¸¹ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
3) Class I ±³ÇÕÀÚ°¡ 27¸íÀ¸·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, °³±³ÇÕÀÌ µ¿¹ÝµÈ °æ¿ì´Â 20¸í, Æò±Õ overjetÀº 3.58§®, overbite´Â 0.97§®¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
4) °úµÎÈí¼ö ºÎÀ§ÀÇ ÅëÁõÀ» È£¼ÒÇÑ °æ¿ì´Â 41¸í, ÅëÁõÀ» È£¼ÒÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ì°¡ 18¸íÀ̾ú´Ù.
5) ÀÌ°¥ÀÌ ½À°üÀ» 26¸í, À̾ǹ°±â ½À°üÀº 24¸íÀÌ º¸°íÇÏ¿´´Ù.
6) ȯÀÚÀÇ Ä¡·á±â°£Àº 1°³¿ù ¹Ì¸¸ÀÌ 23¸í, º¸Á¶¿ä¹ýÀ¸·Î Ä¡·áÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ 28¸íÀ̾ú´Ù.
2. ¾Ç¾È¸é °ñ°Ý ÇüÅ Æò°¡
1) 16¼¼ ¿©ÀÚȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ SNA, SNB´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ ÀÛÀº °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â°í articular angleÀº À¯ÀÇÇÑ Å« °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
2) 17¼¼ ¿©ÀÚȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ SN, SAr, TPFH¿Í ramus height°¡ À¯ÀÇÇÑ ÀÛÀº °ªÀ», SN-GoMe, FMA ±×¸®°í articular angleÀº À¯ÀÇÇÑ Å« °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
3) 18¼¼ ÀÌ»ó ¿©ÀÚ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­´Â SN, SNB, TPFH, ramus heightÀº À¯ÀÇÇÑ ÀÛÀº °ªÀ», ANB, FMA, SN-GoMe, LAFH, articular angle, gonial angleÀº À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ´Â Å« °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
4) 18¼¼ ÀÌ»ó ³²ÀÚ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­´Â SN, TPFH, ramus heightÀº À¯ÀÇÇÑ ÀÛÀº °ªÀ» FMA, SN-GoMe, LAFH, articular angle, gonial angleÀº À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ´Â Å« °ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.
5) mandibular body length´Â 10´ë °úµÎÈí¼ö ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Á¤»óÀΰú Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
10´ë °úµÎÈí¼öÀÇ Æ¯Â¡Àº ÀÓ»óÀûÀ¸·Î ÅëÁõÈ£¼Ò´Â ½ÉÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸³ª °ñ¼Ò½ÇÀÌ ºü¸£°Ô ÀϾ¼­ ÀÌȯÃø °úµÎ¿¡¼­ ÈĹæÁöÁöÀÇ °©ÀÛ½º·± »ó½ÇÀÌ ÃÊ·¡µÇ´Â Ư¹ß¼º °úµÎÈí¼öÀÇ ÇüŸ¦ ¸¹ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³»¸ç °³±³ÇÕ ¹ß»ý ºñÀ²µµ ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ±Ù°ñ°Ý°è ¼ºÀåÀÌ ¿Ï·áµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº 10´ë¿¡ ƯÈ÷ ¼öÁ÷Àû ¾Ç¾È¸é °ñ°ÝÇüÅ·ΠÀÎÇÑ ºÎÇÏÀÇ ÁýÁß°ú ÀÌ»ó±â´ÉÈ°µ¿¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ÇϾǰúµÎ¿¡ °úµµÇÑ ºÎÇÏ°¡ °¡ÇØÁö¸é °úµÎÈí¼ö°¡ ´õ¿í ½±°Ô ÀϾ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, °á±¹ ¾Ç°ñÀÇ ¼ºÀåÀ» ÀúÇØÇÏ°í ¾È¸ð¿¡ ¾Ç¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù.

The aim of this study was to investigate clinical assessment and cephalometric characteristics in 10s patients with condylar resorption, who visited in the Department of Oral Medicine Kyungpook National University Hospital at 2006, by use of panorama, transcranial view and lateral cephalometric radiograph.
The results were as follows;
1. Clinical assessment
1) Total number of patients were 59. Female was 47 and male was 12, Females were predominant and patient¡¯s age ranged from 12 to 19.
2) Most of the patients had Grade II condyle resorption.
3) The number of who had Class I occlusion was 27, which was the largest group. The number of patients with openbite was 20. Average overjet was 3.58§® and average overbite was 0.97§®.
4) Most of the patients had parafunctional habit.
5) The patients of showing the pain in condylar resortion was 41 and the case of not showing the pain was 18.
6) Treatment duration of 23 patients were less than 1 month, 28 patients were treated with supported therapy.
2. Cephalometric Characteristics
1) A 16-year-old female patients showed smaller SNA, SNB and larger articular angle significantly as compared with those of normal group.
2) A 17-year-old female patients showed smaller SN, SAr, TPFH, ramus height and larger SN-GoMe, FMA, articular angle significantly as compared with those of normal group.
3) Over 18 years old female patients showed smaller SN, SNB, TPFH, ramus height and larger ANB, FMA, SN-GoMe, LAFH, articular angle, gonial angle significantly as compared with those of normal group.
4) Over 18 years old male patients showed smaller SN, TPFH, ramus height and larger FMA, SN-GoMe, LAFH, articular angle, gonial angle significantly as compared with those of normal group.
5) There was no significant difference between 10s and normal group in mandibular body length.

Å°¿öµå

10´ë ÇϾǰúµÎÈí¼ö;Ư¹ß¼º °úµÎÈí¼ö;¼öÁ÷Àû ¾È¸ð;ÀÌ»ó±â´ÉÈ°µ¿;°úºÎÇÏ
Condylar resorption in 10s;Idiopathic condylar resorption;Vertical facial pattern;Parafunctional habit;Overload

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI